The plan only sees part of the picture
Your ERP holds planned hours, actual hours and project data. It rarely captures why work has moved or what the team expects to happen next.
Propeller compares planned hours in your ERP with actual timesheets, flags gaps and overruns as they emerge, and suggests the next staffing move. Project leads review every suggestion in Microsoft Teams. Keep your ERP. No second plan for the team to maintain.
We’ll only use your email for Propeller updates. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy notice
Projects change faster than most resource plans. Scope shifts, deadlines move, and the context needed to reallocate people ends up spread across timesheets, Teams and people’s heads.
Your ERP holds planned hours, actual hours and project data. It rarely captures why work has moved or what the team expects to happen next.
A plan that looked right on Monday can be wrong by Friday. By the time the numbers catch up, the team has already absorbed the squeeze.
Project and practice leads compare plans, timesheets and conversations to work out who is free, who is stretched and where to move people next.
Propeller flags projects running over plan, people with capacity and work that still needs an owner. It suggests a staffing change and shows the evidence behind it. Act in Teams, or open the dashboard for the full picture.
Propeller checks the plan in the background. When the numbers no longer line up, it asks the relevant project lead a short question in Teams. They can approve, correct or reject the next move.
Propeller checks planned hours against timesheets to spot overruns, unused capacity and unstaffed work.
When the data does not tell the whole story, a short Teams message lets the project lead explain what changed.
Propeller combines the data and the project lead’s response to suggest a staffing move, with the reasoning attached.
Propeller is designed to keep your ERP as the system of record. It compares resource plans with timesheets, then asks project leads in Teams for the context behind the numbers. No duplicate plan for the team to maintain.
When a lead approves or corrects a suggestion, Propeller records the decision. That helps make later recommendations more relevant to how your firm staffs and delivers projects.
Planned integrations include
Small gaps in the resource plan add up across a billable team. Use your team size, average rate and a realistic improvement in utilisation to estimate the annual capacity at stake.
Adjust the assumptions
A rise from 67% to 71% utilisation across 100 billable people at £110 an hour.
Every suggestion shows the planned hours, actual hours, availability and project history behind it.
Your ERP stays the system of record. Project leads respond in Teams, with no second plan to keep updated.
Propeller recommends. A project or resource lead approves, corrects or rejects. Their decision informs the next suggestion.
No. Your ERP remains the system of record. Propeller is designed to use the resource plans, timesheets and project data already held there.
No. Day-to-day questions and approvals are designed to happen in Microsoft Teams. Resource and operations leads can open the dashboard when they need the full picture.
No. It shows a recommendation and the reasons behind it. A project or resource lead approves, corrects or rejects the change.
Project-led architecture, engineering and construction firms that already use an ERP and want resource plans to reflect what is actually happening.
Propeller is in development. Join early access for product updates and to hear when the first places open.
We’re inviting resource and operations leaders at architecture, engineering and construction firms to help shape Propeller. Leave your work email and we’ll let you know when early access opens.